Abstract:
In the past fifty years, there has been a saying current among English-speaking academia that the exaltation of the divinity of Christ in Barth’s Christology made the humanity of Christ passive, which puts Barth in opposition to Eastern Orthodox Christology. Through a careful study of Church Dogmatics, this article argues that Barth’s arguments on unio hypostatica and communicatio idiomatum share a similar understanding with those of Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Though there are undeniable differences between Barth and Orthodox theology, both grant appropriate status to the humanity of Christ in Christ’s Person without eliminating the active effect of human nature in Christ’s works. This set a good foundation for Barth, who later developed a soteriology different to the traditional Western view of Christ’s nature. In short, Barth’s soteriology is ecumenically significant and shares affinities on the issue of theosis with Eastern Orthodox theology
Keywords:
Barth; Eastern Orthodox; Christology; Unio hypostatica; Communicatio idiomatum
Full Text (International Version):
Full Text (Simplified Chinese Version):
